Embarrassing proof that evolutionists
are wrong,
T.rex
buried by media
by Jen Shroder 10/7/12 free to repost
An 11 year old Russian boy recently
uncovered the remains of a woolly mammoth including fur, bones, flesh
and layers of fat. Scientists are guessing it is 30,000 years old and
report they haven’t seen anything like it in 100 years.
Have
they already forgotten the T. rex uncovered in the year 2000 in
Montana? Using the methods of scientists, they claim it is 68 million
years old, but it has soft tissue with blood cells. That flies against
everything evolutionists claim. A 68 million year old fossil couldn’t
possibly have soft tissue in the bones, yet there it is.
"I am quite aware that according to conventional wisdom and models of
fossilization, these structures aren't supposed to be there, but there
they are. I was pretty shocked," said Mary Higby Schweitzer, assistant
professor in the Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at
North Carolina State University.
Schwietzer was so stunned at the facts that she repeated the
experiments eight times. She co-authored a paper with Jack Horner of
the Museum of the Rockies at Montana State University. Horner said, "I
see this as a really important discovery that will change our methods
of collecting and study. We can truly begin asking biomolecular
questions. The discovery also means that our preconceived ideas about
preservation were wrong."
“Ideas.” One has to appreciate how theories (guesses) taught as FACT
to our children in public schools, are suddenly referred to as “ideas”
when proved wrong. I remember a large group of parents confronting my
son’s 7th grade teacher about how he was about to teach our children
evolution. He promised he would be teaching it as theory, but the
scientific claim of “theory” is taught as fact because (basically)
it’s their best guess after hundreds of “tests.” It doesn’t matter if
every test FAILS, it’s been tested, there is no better GUESS so they
call it a scientific theory, dance around the word and will test our
children to make sure they respond as though these best guesses are
undeniable fact. It’s OUTRAGEOUS.
According to the Smithsonian, in 1999 when Schweitzer first suspected
red blood cells through a microscope, she kept looking and looking and
thinking, “This can’t be. Red blood cells don’t preserve.” She showed
the slide to Horner her mentor who said, “Yep, that’s what they look
like. Now see if you can find some evidence to show that that’s not
what they are.”
Schweitzer gets angry when creationists recognize her work as proving
evolution’s necessary dating theories wrong. She believes that,
“invoking the hand of God to explain natural phenomena breaks the
rules of science. After all,” she says, “what God asks is faith, not
evidence. If you have all this evidence and proof positive that God
exists, you don’t need faith.”
I appreciate that Schweitzer is passionate about finding the truth,
but then denying what it means because she thinks God is purposely
hiding that truth? So we continue to teach our children flat out,
unproven lies cloaked under “theory” but taught as fact? This is worse
than Bill Clinton debating what the meaning of the word “sex” is. At
least we’re not pushing condoms and telling them we’re not promoting
sex on our kids in public school. Oh wait, we do. Well, at least we’re
not pushing abortions without calling it murder…oh wait, we do that
too.
Matthew Carrano, curator of dinosaurs at the Smithsonian’s National
Museum of Natural history, said the T. rex find was a huge opportunity
to learn more about how fossils are made, a process that is not fully
understood.”
WHAT? Scientists don’t fully understand how fossils are made? That’s
hard to believe when there appears to be so much unified information
claiming to know EXACTLY how fossils are made and how old they are.
Right up until the moment they are proved wrong.
Schweitzer, now looking for proof, found so much that the only
argument to be had came from paleontologist Tom Kaye who said, "If you
start finding diamonds every 20 feet, you have to start asking
yourself: are diamonds that common, or is it a different kind of
sand?" You can’t make this stuff up. Oh wait, they do. And the media
buries the story.
I have been reading a lot about scientific methods of dating, about
isochrons with guessed "starting dates", or about molten rock in the
Grand Canyon giving impossible results with modern techniques, or
about excess argon screwing up test results, I could tell you about K-Ar
Mount Ngauruhoe in New Zealand, how eruptions in 1949, 1954 and 1975
tested .27 to 3.5 million years old. I could talk about how
radioisotope laboratories provide forms with sample submissions asking
the customer how old HE estimates the sample to be. Why? Why does the
lab that is asked to provide how old an object is, ask the inquirer
what THEIR guess is?
I could tell you about carbon dating and how the earth's magnetic
field, cosmic rays and the GUESSED 14C levels contribute to flawed
results. I could tell you how researchers just "throw out" samples
that don't line up with their calculations. I could tell you how
plants discriminate against carbon dioxide differently so scientists
can just "guess & correct" manipulating tests any way they want.
But all of these variables are not that impressive to me, they just
show that the data that is fed into these techniques is easily skewed.
And that is why, if you don't calculate two events in history, you
WILL get completely messed up results. And that is two events in the
Bible. First, the flood would have greatly changed the carbon balance.
Lowered 12C in biosphere, the 14C relative to 12C is greatly altered.
But that's not the biggest cataclysm that is often overlooked.
The Bible says in Genesis 2:4
"This is the history of the
heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD
God made the earth and the heavens, before any plant of the field was
in the earth and before any herb of the field had grown. For the LORD
God had not caused it to rain on the earth, and there was no man to
till the ground; but a mist went up from the earth and watered the
whole face of the ground."
From creation to the flood, the
biosphere of the earth was radically different. There was no rain,
there was mist that came from the ground and watered the whole face of
the earth. Scientists have been using techniques that do not account
for the radical change between creation and the flood. If their
test results are so skewed merely from the earth's magnetic field and
solar radiation, imagine what the radically different physics of the
earth watering itself would do. A change that apparently caused
man to age differently. If you notice, the age of man according to the
Bible slowly decreased, one naturally thinks the aging process changed
but that's wrong. Earlier men lived longer before the flood than
younger men who were born nearer to the flood. It was the flood that
decreased their life span. And after the flood when life spans were
seriously shortened, it was because of a radically different mix of
radiation and mist. I can't imagine what it was like before the flood
but it was drastically different than today.
And what about those embarrassing "living fossils", the occasional
discovery of plants and life that crop up that science claimed to be
extinct for hundreds of millions of years?
The academic elite have been doing everything they possibly can to
chip away at the faith of our children in public school. They seem to
be desperate to feed them anything they can find to replace what the
Bible says. It is so outrageous, but we really must pity them and pray
for them, because if they don’t turn around, if they don’t get a grip
on who the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is, if they don’t seek
Jesus Christ and ask forgiveness for the atrocities they have imposed
on our children, then the Bible says it would be better for them if a
millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the
sea.
Pray for them but protect your children. Get them out of public
school. It is the darkest place for their soul that you can imagine.
SOURCE:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html#ixzz28XE608EX
Evelyn Boswell, 3/25/05, Montana
State University News
BACK TO BLESSEDCAUSE
HOME
